Guaranteeing a competitive future for MSS

Posted in Aeronautical, Broadband, Financials, Globalstar, Handheld, Inmarsat, Iridium, Maritime, Operators, Services, VSAT at 2:57 pm by timfarrar

So Iridium has finally announced the contract to build its NEXT satellites, which was won by Thales Alenia Space (TAS) with the support of a stunning $1.8B loan package which will be 95% guaranteed by COFACE, the French Export Credit Agency (ECA). By the sound of it, Lockheed had been confident of winning the contract, but the US Ex-Im Bank simply couldn’t match the level of support offered by COFACE.

Even Iridium appears surprised by the $1.8B Promise of Guarantee, given the suggestions in their March 2010 results call that the company would need to raise additional unsecured or subordinated debt in the public market. We had expected Iridium might need to raise $300M or more in backstop financing, based on Iridium’s April 2010 investor presentation which stated that the company was “seeking support for a[n ECA] facility of approximately $1.5B”. COFACE’s additional support therefore clearly appears to have tipped the balance in favor of TAS, because it removes the risk that Iridium would have faced in trying to tap the public markets at this point in time.

We now expect Globalstar to point out that Iridium has received an even more favorable financing package than Globalstar did last year (when Thermo was required to provide additional backstop funding as a condition of the $586M COFACE-backed facility) and potentially to seek a $200M+ extension of its current facility. This would provide funding so Globalstar could exercise its option to purchase the last 24 second generation satellites, allowing them to add more satellites to their constellation before NEXT becomes operational (and before radiation problems are expected to start impacting their 8 first generation spares in about 2015). Such a facility could also give Globalstar more firepower to market its new second generation services in 2011 and 2012, without the risk of eating into the contingent equity and debt service reserve accounts previously established by Thermo.

The next stage in this war of the Export Credit Agencies may then come in the shape of Inmarsat’s upcoming Ka-band constellation, which we expect to involve 3 or 4 dedicated Ka-band satellites (costing at least $200M each including launch and insurance), providing oceanic coverage to complement and extend its existing FleetBroadband and SwiftBroadband services. With Inmarsat’s new satellites expected to be deployed between 2013 and 2015, an order could well come as soon as this summer, when Inmarsat announces its investor guidance for the next five years. More details of Inmarsat’s plans and our expectations for their future Ka-band revenues were given in the March 2010 report, available to subscribers to our MSS information service.

The competition to build Inmarsat’s new satellites appears once again to be shaping up as a US vs European battle with TAS, SS/L and Astrium all bidding for the contract. Will ECA financing once again prove to be a key factor in the decision, even though Inmarsat has much less need for a guarantee than Iridium and Globalstar? Certainly Inmarsat has not been reluctant to seek cheap government-backed funding when it is available, as seen in its recent European Investment Bank loan to fund the Alphasat project.

In summary, its clear that ECA financing is now going to play a very substantial role in supporting the MSS industry. As a result, the prospects for a long awaited consolidation of the sector appear to be diminishing. That is certainly good news for end users of MSS, as well as service providers and distributors, who will be able to take advantage of an increasing range of competitive alternatives. This is particularly true in the maritime and aeronautical markets, where Iridium is really the only potential MSS competitor for Inmarsat. Indeed Iridium’s ability to serve these markets gives it a much more sustainable long term position than some other systems, because most maritime and aeronautical opportunities are much less likely to be undermined by the buildout of terrestrial wireless systems.

Nevertheless, it also seems hard to justify the $8B+ of capital investment that has been committed by Iridium, Globalstar and all of the other players (Iridium NEXT, Globalstar 2, Inmarsat 4, Orbcomm, ICO/DBSD, SkyTerra and TerreStar) in an industry sector which only generated $1.1B in wholesale service revenues in 2009, and though growing healthily, doesn’t appear poised to breakout from the 8% annual growth rate seen in recent years. Unless new sources of value appear (spectrum monetization being the obvious option for several players) it appears unlikely that all of the MSS operators will be as successful as they and their investors hope.

Indeed the main story of the next decade is likely to be the competition between Iridium and Globalstar, as they both strive to be the second biggest player in an MSS market that will continue to be dominated by Inmarsat, while other providers may fall by the wayside. If Iridium can grow from its current 19% share of wholesale service revenues to about a 25% market share, or Globalstar can grow from its current 5% share to 15% or more (based on its lower cost satellite system), then that should be sufficient to achieve an attractive return on capital for either company. However, with Inmarsat holding a more than 60% market share today, it appears unlikely that both Iridium and Globalstar could achieve this level of success simultaneously.


  1. geoff goodfellow said,

    June 3, 2010 at 9:44 am

    apparently everyone except spacenews seems to have missed or just not reported that the $2.1 billion contract (or would that more aptly be a Le Bailout for Iridium ala what Iridium CEO Matt Desch said about Globalstar in 2009?? http://www.satellitetoday.com/eletters/satellite2009_daily/fromtheshowfloor/30444.html ) for Thales Alenia Space of France to build Iridium’s second-generation constellation still needs final validation by France’s export-credit agency, Coface and, for now, is limited to a “promise of guarantee,” that is expected to take several months.

    in the meantime:

    “… To enable work on satellites to start immediately, Iridium and Thales Alenia Space have signed a $53 million authorization to proceed, which is expected to cover three months’ work at the Cannes, France-based manufacturer.

    “This precontract work could be extended for another three months, extending through November, for a second payment of $53 million. …

    for the full scoop and interview details with the CEO’s, see:


    TMF comment: However, there is a big difference between the current situation for Iridium and Globalstar’s position when they announced their COFACE funding back in March 2009. Globalstar had to find additional equity/debt (some raised in the public markets) for backstop financing as a precondition to closing the COFACE loan. Iridium on the other hand has no such requirements, it merely needs to syndicate the loan. Given that 95% of the loan will be backed by the French govt, the interest rate is obviously going to be only marginally more than that on French government bonds. Its actually good news for Iridium that it has the money to move forward immediately through an ATP. In contrast, last summer Globalstar had to wait for the COFACE funding to come through before TAS could restart work, which delayed the launch of their satellites by several months.

  2. Intermedia » Archive du blog » Le gouvernement français prête 1,8 milliard de dollars à une entreprise américaine en faillite et la presse reste muette !… said,

    July 29, 2010 at 1:09 pm

    [...] exemple, l’agence de notation financière américaine TMF, qui reprend un article du SpaceNews, soulève des questions quant au financement, à la [...]

  3. On the web « parlonzen said,

    August 25, 2010 at 6:37 am

    [...] Guaranteeing a competitive future for MSS TMF Associates MSS blog [...]

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.