<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TMF Associates blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpaceX&#8217;s Rorschach test by Why SpaceX bought xAI &#124; Mashable</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2026/01/03/spacexs-rorschach-test/comment-page-1/#comment-107983</link>
		<dc:creator>Why SpaceX bought xAI &#124; Mashable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=6862#comment-107983</guid>
		<description>[...] plan &quot;a Rorschach test for potential SpaceX investors, just like Optimus does for Tesla investors,&quot; in a post on the group&#039;s website.&quot;Both allow for near term demonstrations that look impressive but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plan &quot;a Rorschach test for potential SpaceX investors, just like Optimus does for Tesla investors,&quot; in a post on the group&#039;s website.&quot;Both allow for near term demonstrations that look impressive but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpaceX disrupts everyone&#8217;s plans again&#8230; by Why SpaceX made a $17B bet on the direct-to-cell market &#124; TechCrunch</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2025/09/08/spacex-disrupts-everyones-plans-again/comment-page-1/#comment-107877</link>
		<dc:creator>Why SpaceX made a $17B bet on the direct-to-cell market &#124; TechCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=6840#comment-107877</guid>
		<description>[...] and Apple has committed over $1.5 billion to further expand satellite-enabled iPhone services. But some analysts are wondering if SpaceX’s move is leverage to persuade Apple to cooperate with SpaceX instead of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Apple has committed over $1.5 billion to further expand satellite-enabled iPhone services. But some analysts are wondering if SpaceX’s move is leverage to persuade Apple to cooperate with SpaceX instead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpaceX disrupts everyone&#8217;s plans again&#8230; by SpaceX ha comprado el espectro que EchoStar no logró usar: la nueva carrera espacial ya no es llegar al espacio, es controlarlo</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2025/09/08/spacex-disrupts-everyones-plans-again/comment-page-1/#comment-107871</link>
		<dc:creator>SpaceX ha comprado el espectro que EchoStar no logró usar: la nueva carrera espacial ya no es llegar al espacio, es controlarlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 12:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=6840#comment-107871</guid>
		<description>[...] competidor en servicios satelitales móviles directos.Por qué es importante. Esta operación convierte a SpaceX en el gran dominador de la conectividad móvil satelital. Ya no competirá solo con operadores terrestres, sino que controlará toda la cadena de valor, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] competidor en servicios satelitales móviles directos.Por qué es importante. Esta operación convierte a SpaceX en el gran dominador de la conectividad móvil satelital. Ya no competirá solo con operadores terrestres, sino que controlará toda la cadena de valor, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s next for EchoStar? by Op-Ed: My not-so-hot take on EchoStar’s big spectrum sellout - Fiber Speed Test</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2025/08/31/whats-next-for-echostar/comment-page-1/#comment-107868</link>
		<dc:creator>Op-Ed: My not-so-hot take on EchoStar’s big spectrum sellout - Fiber Speed Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=6824#comment-107868</guid>
		<description>[...] led to some speculation that AT&amp;T could swap the 600 MHz spectrum for T-Mobile’s C-band spectrum, which sounds logical, but business deals aren’t always done in ways that make the most sense [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] led to some speculation that AT&amp;T could swap the 600 MHz spectrum for T-Mobile’s C-band spectrum, which sounds logical, but business deals aren’t always done in ways that make the most sense [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Choose carefully Charlie&#8230; by La razón oculta por la que Elon Musk lanza satélites de archienemigos como Jeff Bezos: el espectro radioeléctrico</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2025/08/08/choose-carefully-charlie/comment-page-1/#comment-107858</link>
		<dc:creator>La razón oculta por la que Elon Musk lanza satélites de archienemigos como Jeff Bezos: el espectro radioeléctrico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=6768#comment-107858</guid>
		<description>[...] de SpaceX en una situación increíblemente difícil. Es una disyuntiva que el analista Tim Farrar describe como &quot;elegir con cuidado&quot;. Empresas como EchoStar o Globalstar han tenido que decidir entre pasar por el aro de SpaceX, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de SpaceX en una situación increíblemente difícil. Es una disyuntiva que el analista Tim Farrar describe como &quot;elegir con cuidado&quot;. Empresas como EchoStar o Globalstar han tenido que decidir entre pasar por el aro de SpaceX, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reality and hype in satellite constellations&#8230; by TMF Associates blog &#187; Starlink has won the race for LEO broadband &#8211; what now?</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2019/12/12/reality-and-hype-in-satellite-constellations/comment-page-1/#comment-107522</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates blog &#187; Starlink has won the race for LEO broadband &#8211; what now?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 18:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-107522</guid>
		<description>[...] return to those recent investors at the ludicrous valuation of $127B, because satellite will remain a last resort solution compared to terrestrial fiber, cable modem and even 5G fixed wireless options, but it does mean [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] return to those recent investors at the ludicrous valuation of $127B, because satellite will remain a last resort solution compared to terrestrial fiber, cable modem and even 5G fixed wireless options, but it does mean [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem by TMF Associates blog &#187; Solving real problems doesn&#8217;t mean bailing out fake business plans</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2020/04/05/spacex-and-the-fccs-16b-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-106741</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates blog &#187; Solving real problems doesn&#8217;t mean bailing out fake business plans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=6505#comment-106741</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not talking about SpaceX and the RDOF auction, I&#8217;m returning to a topic I haven&#8217;t written about for years (but also provided plenty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m not talking about SpaceX and the RDOF auction, I&#8217;m returning to a topic I haven&#8217;t written about for years (but also provided plenty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reality and hype in satellite constellations&#8230; by TMF Associates blog &#187; SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2019/12/12/reality-and-hype-in-satellite-constellations/comment-page-1/#comment-106735</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates blog &#187; SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=6469#comment-106735</guid>
		<description>[...] concerns right now. But when Elon Musk has convinced many gullible people that Starlink will &#8220;catalyze enormous positive change, bringing, for the first time, billions of humans into our future ...&#8221; and so it would be &#8220;stupid to put one more federal dime into rural broadband when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] concerns right now. But when Elon Musk has convinced many gullible people that Starlink will &#8220;catalyze enormous positive change, bringing, for the first time, billions of humans into our future &#8230;&#8221; and so it would be &#8220;stupid to put one more federal dime into rural broadband when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There&#8217;s no there there&#8230; by TMF Associates blog &#187; SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/12/07/theres-no-there-there/comment-page-1/#comment-106734</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates blog &#187; SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2778#comment-106734</guid>
		<description>[...] knowing that LightSquared&#8217;s promise of an integrated satellite-terrestrial network was nonsense (not least because LightSquared had already told the FCC in November 2010 that the wholesale cost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] knowing that LightSquared&#8217;s promise of an integrated satellite-terrestrial network was nonsense (not least because LightSquared had already told the FCC in November 2010 that the wholesale cost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LightSquared and the FCC&#8217;s $10B problem by TMF Associates blog &#187; SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/09/20/lightsquared-and-the-fccs-10b-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-106733</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates blog &#187; SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2455#comment-106733</guid>
		<description>[...] and a half years ago, I wrote a blog post that got a lot of attention inside the FCC, comparing LightSquared&#8217;s request for a license [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and a half years ago, I wrote a blog post that got a lot of attention inside the FCC, comparing LightSquared&#8217;s request for a license [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
