<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2001: A Space Odyssey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2016/03/09/2001-a-space-odyssey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2016/03/09/2001-a-space-odyssey/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates blog &#187; Viasat&#8217;s curious antenna issues</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2016/03/09/2001-a-space-odyssey/comment-page-1/#comment-97588</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates blog &#187; Viasat&#8217;s curious antenna issues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 21:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5704#comment-97588</guid>
		<description>[...] antennas are deemed so sensitive by Viasat when Harris themselves were happy to publish a mockup image back in 2016 (which has since been removed from their website) and the size of the antenna can easily be worked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] antennas are deemed so sensitive by Viasat when Harris themselves were happy to publish a mockup image back in 2016 (which has since been removed from their website) and the size of the antenna can easily be worked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Finding the poison pill&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2016/03/09/2001-a-space-odyssey/comment-page-1/#comment-81403</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Finding the poison pill&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5704#comment-81403</guid>
		<description>[...] I noted after the Satellite 2016 conference a couple of weeks ago, the outline of an FCC compromise over Globalstar&#8217;s TLPS proposal has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I noted after the Satellite 2016 conference a couple of weeks ago, the outline of an FCC compromise over Globalstar&#8217;s TLPS proposal has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timfarrar</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2016/03/09/2001-a-space-odyssey/comment-page-1/#comment-81279</link>
		<dc:creator>timfarrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5704#comment-81279</guid>
		<description>There would not be any exclusion zones as far as I know, because the claim is that there will not be any interference. The protection is just that you have a number to phone them up and complain if do you experience interference (that is the &quot;Network Operating System&quot;) and they promise to resolve it. However, there&#039;s no guarantee they will admit that a problem is their fault or that the TLPS channel will be taken offline during any investigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There would not be any exclusion zones as far as I know, because the claim is that there will not be any interference. The protection is just that you have a number to phone them up and complain if do you experience interference (that is the &#8220;Network Operating System&#8221;) and they promise to resolve it. However, there&#8217;s no guarantee they will admit that a problem is their fault or that the TLPS channel will be taken offline during any investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dane1234</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2016/03/09/2001-a-space-odyssey/comment-page-1/#comment-81272</link>
		<dc:creator>dane1234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2016 01:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5704#comment-81272</guid>
		<description>If Globalstar&#039;s TLPS is approved, presumably the operational areas of grandfathered TV BAS Channel A10 TV Pickup stations will be protected, just like the FCC did in the WT Docket 10-153 &quot;BAS Flexibility&quot; rulemaking, where newcomer Part 101 Fixed Service stations entering the 7 and 13 GHz Part 74 TV BAS bands had to protect the operational areas of TV Pickup stations in those bands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Globalstar&#8217;s TLPS is approved, presumably the operational areas of grandfathered TV BAS Channel A10 TV Pickup stations will be protected, just like the FCC did in the WT Docket 10-153 &#8220;BAS Flexibility&#8221; rulemaking, where newcomer Part 101 Fixed Service stations entering the 7 and 13 GHz Part 74 TV BAS bands had to protect the operational areas of TV Pickup stations in those bands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
