<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A time to hold and a time to fold&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2015/06/24/a-time-to-hold-and-a-time-to-fold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2015/06/24/a-time-to-hold-and-a-time-to-fold/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates blog &#187; Back to the Future Part 2&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2015/06/24/a-time-to-hold-and-a-time-to-fold/comment-page-1/#comment-88004</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates blog &#187; Back to the Future Part 2&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 21:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5535#comment-88004</guid>
		<description>[...] 10MHz TDLTE channel, which is restricted to operate only at low power? Back in June 2015, I noted that there clearly would be some value for standard high power operation, but the question is a very different one for a low power [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10MHz TDLTE channel, which is restricted to operate only at low power? Back in June 2015, I noted that there clearly would be some value for standard high power operation, but the question is a very different one for a low power [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dane1234</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2015/06/24/a-time-to-hold-and-a-time-to-fold/comment-page-1/#comment-74049</link>
		<dc:creator>dane1234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5535#comment-74049</guid>
		<description>Rebanding the 2.5 GHz TV BAS band means modifying the hardware of all 2.5 GHz TV BAS licensees to three digital channels at 2,450-2,483.5 MHz, not just the grandfathered A10 (2,483.5-2,500 MHz) licensees.  A similar process worked out well for both AWS and broadcasters in the refarming of the 2 GHz TV BAS band, from 1,990-2,110 MHz to 2,025-2,110 MHz; that is, from 17-MHz wide analog channels to 12-MHz wide digital channels, to free up 35 MHz of spectrum for AWS.  The cost to Sprint Nextel was about $700M (WT Docket 02-55).  The cost of refarming the 2.5 GHz TV BAS band would be less, since the radios from the 2 GHz transition are frequency and modulation agile, so in most cases could be reprogrammed rather than replaced.  As a bonus, this would also solve the FCC&#039;s problem with 2,496-2,502 MHz BRS Channel 1 stations vs grandfathered A10 stations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebanding the 2.5 GHz TV BAS band means modifying the hardware of all 2.5 GHz TV BAS licensees to three digital channels at 2,450-2,483.5 MHz, not just the grandfathered A10 (2,483.5-2,500 MHz) licensees.  A similar process worked out well for both AWS and broadcasters in the refarming of the 2 GHz TV BAS band, from 1,990-2,110 MHz to 2,025-2,110 MHz; that is, from 17-MHz wide analog channels to 12-MHz wide digital channels, to free up 35 MHz of spectrum for AWS.  The cost to Sprint Nextel was about $700M (WT Docket 02-55).  The cost of refarming the 2.5 GHz TV BAS band would be less, since the radios from the 2 GHz transition are frequency and modulation agile, so in most cases could be reprogrammed rather than replaced.  As a bonus, this would also solve the FCC&#8217;s problem with 2,496-2,502 MHz BRS Channel 1 stations vs grandfathered A10 stations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
