<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding the LightSquared bankruptcy ruling&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2014/05/08/understanding-the-lightsquared-bankruptcy-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2014/05/08/understanding-the-lightsquared-bankruptcy-ruling/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Playing in the mud&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2014/05/08/understanding-the-lightsquared-bankruptcy-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-35572</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Playing in the mud&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 05:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5019#comment-35572</guid>
		<description>[...] was clearly for SPSO to indicate the amount of subordination which would be acceptable. As I noted back in May, Judge Chapman&#8217;s ruling should allow at least $320M (face value) of SPSO&#8217;s holdings, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was clearly for SPSO to indicate the amount of subordination which would be acceptable. As I noted back in May, Judge Chapman&#8217;s ruling should allow at least $320M (face value) of SPSO&#8217;s holdings, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Mediate this&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2014/05/08/understanding-the-lightsquared-bankruptcy-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-32755</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Mediate this&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5019#comment-32755</guid>
		<description>[...] That plan apparently involves Harbinger being left with no stake in the reorganized company, as I predicted when Judge Chapman made her ruling last month. As a result, although the suggestion last week from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That plan apparently involves Harbinger being left with no stake in the reorganized company, as I predicted when Judge Chapman made her ruling last month. As a result, although the suggestion last week from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Mutually assured destruction&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2014/05/08/understanding-the-lightsquared-bankruptcy-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-31851</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Mutually assured destruction&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 18:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=5019#comment-31851</guid>
		<description>[...] effort to avoid being excluded from the resolution of LightSquared&#8217;s bankruptcy case, where (as I concluded) Judge Chapman&#8217;s decision to reject the LightSquared bankruptcy plan has made it far more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] effort to avoid being excluded from the resolution of LightSquared&#8217;s bankruptcy case, where (as I concluded) Judge Chapman&#8217;s decision to reject the LightSquared bankruptcy plan has made it far more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
