<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Once more unto the breach&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/09/28/once-more-unto-the-breach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/09/28/once-more-unto-the-breach/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; FCC budget shreds LightSquared&#8217;s spectrum swap proposal&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/09/28/once-more-unto-the-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; FCC budget shreds LightSquared&#8217;s spectrum swap proposal&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3619#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>[...] budget, released on Wednesday, now appears to have sounded the death knell for LightSquared&#8217;s September 2012 spectrum swap proposal, that it should be granted access to the 1675-80MHz band, in exchange for giving up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] budget, released on Wednesday, now appears to have sounded the death knell for LightSquared&#8217;s September 2012 spectrum swap proposal, that it should be granted access to the 1675-80MHz band, in exchange for giving up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Coordinate that!</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/09/28/once-more-unto-the-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Coordinate that!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 22:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3619#comment-980</guid>
		<description>[...] I noted in an earlier post, it was quite surprising to read LightSquared&#8217;s assertions in court last Monday October 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I noted in an earlier post, it was quite surprising to read LightSquared&#8217;s assertions in court last Monday October 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; This speech, like youth, wasted on the young&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/09/28/once-more-unto-the-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; This speech, like youth, wasted on the young&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3619#comment-972</guid>
		<description>[...] to downlinks). However, this leave LightSquared in a bind over the spectrum &#8220;swap&#8221; it proposed last Friday, because LightSquared does not want more uplink spectrum (let alone having to buy it in an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to downlinks). However, this leave LightSquared in a bind over the spectrum &#8220;swap&#8221; it proposed last Friday, because LightSquared does not want more uplink spectrum (let alone having to buy it in an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
