<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The next chapter&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/04/06/the-next-chapter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/04/06/the-next-chapter/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Decisions, decisions&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/04/06/the-next-chapter/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Decisions, decisions&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3287#comment-862</guid>
		<description>[...] space&#8221; before any additional payments need to be made, is in line with the deal that I noted was on the table two weeks ago, and shows that Harbinger is still attaching importance to its spectrum rights under the agreement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] space&#8221; before any additional payments need to be made, is in line with the deal that I noted was on the table two weeks ago, and shows that Harbinger is still attaching importance to its spectrum rights under the agreement [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; The heat is on&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/04/06/the-next-chapter/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; The heat is on&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3287#comment-858</guid>
		<description>[...] Two weeks ago I thought that the April 20 deadline (this coming Friday), when Inmarsat can terminate its Cooperation Agreement with LightSquared, could provide the impetus for a decision on whether or not to file for bankruptcy sometime this week. However, if the future of Harbinger itself is riding on avoiding a potential default on the Jefferies loan, then the Inmarsat deadline might well now be ignored. Inmarsat has been standing firm on its insistence that it must be paid even more money to contemplate any extension of the Cooperation Agreement, so if the April 20 deadline passes without payment being made, then it is hard to see an outcome where Inmarsat doesn&#8217;t just terminate the Agreement for default, and reclaim several additional MHz of spectrum from LightSquared as part of these default conditions. In those circumstances, it would become even harder for LightSquared&#8217;s successors to ever deploy a terrestrial network in the L-band MSS spectrum, even if the FCC was to mandate GPS receiver standards at some point in the future. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two weeks ago I thought that the April 20 deadline (this coming Friday), when Inmarsat can terminate its Cooperation Agreement with LightSquared, could provide the impetus for a decision on whether or not to file for bankruptcy sometime this week. However, if the future of Harbinger itself is riding on avoiding a potential default on the Jefferies loan, then the Inmarsat deadline might well now be ignored. Inmarsat has been standing firm on its insistence that it must be paid even more money to contemplate any extension of the Cooperation Agreement, so if the April 20 deadline passes without payment being made, then it is hard to see an outcome where Inmarsat doesn&#8217;t just terminate the Agreement for default, and reclaim several additional MHz of spectrum from LightSquared as part of these default conditions. In those circumstances, it would become even harder for LightSquared&#8217;s successors to ever deploy a terrestrial network in the L-band MSS spectrum, even if the FCC was to mandate GPS receiver standards at some point in the future. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
