<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the FCC&#8217;s NPRM designed to fail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/03/21/is-the-fccs-nprm-designed-to-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/03/21/is-the-fccs-nprm-designed-to-fail/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: timfarrar</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/03/21/is-the-fccs-nprm-designed-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>timfarrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3246#comment-852</guid>
		<description>I would assume that some minimalist network would be deployed to meet the substantial service requirements (as Clearwire has done to preserve many of its licenses). This does however create some more urgency for LightSquared to make a decision on how to proceed (presumably by disposing of the spectrum) because otherwise additional costs will have to be incurred pretty soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would assume that some minimalist network would be deployed to meet the substantial service requirements (as Clearwire has done to preserve many of its licenses). This does however create some more urgency for LightSquared to make a decision on how to proceed (presumably by disposing of the spectrum) because otherwise additional costs will have to be incurred pretty soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serena</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/03/21/is-the-fccs-nprm-designed-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Serena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3246#comment-850</guid>
		<description>The FCC license of the 1670-1675 MHz band was granted to CCI in April 2003, for 10 years. It&#039;s subject to the usual requirement to deploy a substantial network, or would lapse at the period end, which will be soon. Since LS is unlikely to do anything in this regard, would the FCC grant an extension, or just get back the spectrum to proceed with a refarming plan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FCC license of the 1670-1675 MHz band was granted to CCI in April 2003, for 10 years. It&#8217;s subject to the usual requirement to deploy a substantial network, or would lapse at the period end, which will be soon. Since LS is unlikely to do anything in this regard, would the FCC grant an extension, or just get back the spectrum to proceed with a refarming plan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
