<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The default outcome&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/02/20/the-default-outcome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/02/20/the-default-outcome/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; I did it my way&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/02/20/the-default-outcome/comment-page-1/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; I did it my way&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3124#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>[...] on L-band services and a release of some of the cash previously received from LightSquared (and never spent on installing filters) could help to meet expectations in the next few years, even if GX does not live up to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on L-band services and a release of some of the cash previously received from LightSquared (and never spent on installing filters) could help to meet expectations in the next few years, even if GX does not live up to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Decisions, decisions&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/02/20/the-default-outcome/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Decisions, decisions&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3124#comment-863</guid>
		<description>[...] failed to perform its obligations under Phase 1 of the Cooperation Agreement (despite the fact that Inmarsat failed to retrofit any of its terminals with filters) and as a result Inmarsat is now saying there is &#8220;a high degree of confidence&#8221; that it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] failed to perform its obligations under Phase 1 of the Cooperation Agreement (despite the fact that Inmarsat failed to retrofit any of its terminals with filters) and as a result Inmarsat is now saying there is &#8220;a high degree of confidence&#8221; that it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Negotiate to lose?</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/02/20/the-default-outcome/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Negotiate to lose?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3124#comment-834</guid>
		<description>[...] on Earth&#8221; and it appears that LightSquared are unlikely to prove the author wrong. I noted last week that LightSquared&#8217;s contract with Inmarsat apparently permitted Inmarsat to assert completion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Earth&#8221; and it appears that LightSquared are unlikely to prove the author wrong. I noted last week that LightSquared&#8217;s contract with Inmarsat apparently permitted Inmarsat to assert completion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Going up&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/02/20/the-default-outcome/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Going up&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=3124#comment-832</guid>
		<description>[...] downturn and military pullback from Afghanistan. Now 2012 has started on an even worse note, with LightSquared defaulting on its $56.25M Feb 18 payment to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] downturn and military pullback from Afghanistan. Now 2012 has started on an even worse note, with LightSquared defaulting on its $56.25M Feb 18 payment to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
