<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get your spectrum here&#8230;or not&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/01/20/get-your-spectrum-here-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/01/20/get-your-spectrum-here-or-not/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Did AT&#38;T&#8217;s spectrum deep dive dump DISH deal?</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/01/20/get-your-spectrum-here-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Did AT&#38;T&#8217;s spectrum deep dive dump DISH deal?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2970#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>[...] early 2012 with a view to buying the 1670-75MHz spectrum block (when LightSquared indicated it was considering a sale of these spectrum leases), and its inconceivable that AT&amp;T didn&#8217;t also discuss with DISH the possibility of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] early 2012 with a view to buying the 1670-75MHz spectrum block (when LightSquared indicated it was considering a sale of these spectrum leases), and its inconceivable that AT&amp;T didn&#8217;t also discuss with DISH the possibility of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Complicated legal arguments&#8230;and simple math</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/01/20/get-your-spectrum-here-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Complicated legal arguments&#8230;and simple math</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2970#comment-788</guid>
		<description>[...] appear that the FCC is at least cognizant of LightSquared&#8217;s legal strategy, and is likely (as I predicted) to ultimately rule that the Interference-Resolution Process should be prolonged (and extended to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appear that the FCC is at least cognizant of LightSquared&#8217;s legal strategy, and is likely (as I predicted) to ultimately rule that the Interference-Resolution Process should be prolonged (and extended to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Who to sue?</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2012/01/20/get-your-spectrum-here-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; Who to sue?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2970#comment-783</guid>
		<description>[...] into bankruptcy immediately after an unfavorable FCC ruling, assuming that comes in the next couple of weeks. The key reason for this would be that LightSquared is due to pay Inmarsat $56.25M on February 18 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into bankruptcy immediately after an unfavorable FCC ruling, assuming that comes in the next couple of weeks. The key reason for this would be that LightSquared is due to pay Inmarsat $56.25M on February 18 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
