<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s no there there&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/12/07/theres-no-there-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/12/07/theres-no-there-there/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates blog &#187; SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/12/07/theres-no-there-there/comment-page-1/#comment-106734</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates blog &#187; SpaceX and the FCC&#8217;s $16B problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2778#comment-106734</guid>
		<description>[...] knowing that LightSquared&#8217;s promise of an integrated satellite-terrestrial network was nonsense (not least because LightSquared had already told the FCC in November 2010 that the wholesale cost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] knowing that LightSquared&#8217;s promise of an integrated satellite-terrestrial network was nonsense (not least because LightSquared had already told the FCC in November 2010 that the wholesale cost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Tech Review &#124; A $10,000 gigabyte: Why we shouldn’t mourn for LightSquared</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/12/07/theres-no-there-there/comment-page-1/#comment-14997</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Tech Review &#124; A $10,000 gigabyte: Why we shouldn’t mourn for LightSquared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 08:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2778#comment-14997</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as telecom industry analyst Tim Farrar blogged “There’s no there there.??? It was later revealed that even the rural home turfs of some of the plan’s strongest supporters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A $10,000 gigabyte: Why we shouldn’t mourn for LightSquared &#124; Tech Auntie</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/12/07/theres-no-there-there/comment-page-1/#comment-14930</link>
		<dc:creator>A $10,000 gigabyte: Why we shouldn’t mourn for LightSquared &#124; Tech Auntie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 21:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2778#comment-14930</guid>
		<description>[...] as telecom industry analyst Tim Farrar blogged &#8220;There&#8217;s no there there.&#8221; It was later revealed that even the rural home turfs of some of the plan&#8217;s strongest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as telecom industry analyst Tim Farrar blogged &ldquo;There&#8217;s no there there.&rdquo; It was later revealed that even the rural home turfs of some of the plan&#8217;s strongest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A $10,000 gigabyte: Why we shouldn&#8217;t mourn for LightSquared &#8212; Tech News and Analysis</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/12/07/theres-no-there-there/comment-page-1/#comment-14929</link>
		<dc:creator>A $10,000 gigabyte: Why we shouldn&#8217;t mourn for LightSquared &#8212; Tech News and Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 21:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2778#comment-14929</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as telecom industry analyst Tim Farrar blogged “There’s no there there.??? It was later revealed that even the rural home turfs of some of the plan’s strongest supporters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should GPS Users Accept New &#8216;Fees&#8217;? &#124; GPS World</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/12/07/theres-no-there-there/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>Should GPS Users Accept New &#8216;Fees&#8217;? &#124; GPS World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2778#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>[...] existing or in the works, that do not hurt GPS, and then we find out that the plan might not be as ubiquitous as we might [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] existing or in the works, that do not hurt GPS, and then we find out that the plan might not be as ubiquitous as we might [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
