<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The spectrum bubble, one year on&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/10/11/the-spectrum-bubble-one-year-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/10/11/the-spectrum-bubble-one-year-on/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jritz</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/10/11/the-spectrum-bubble-one-year-on/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>jritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2567#comment-691</guid>
		<description>You are a little off on the bond prices.  The 1st lien notes are $76-77 after moving up yesterday afternoon to the lower $70s and this morning to current levels.  As far as I know the 1st liens have not gotten as low as $50.  During the Sprint call they were briefly in the mid $60s but settled at about $69-$70 on Friday.  2nd lien are $44.5-$47. Not sure on the converts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a little off on the bond prices.  The 1st lien notes are $76-77 after moving up yesterday afternoon to the lower $70s and this morning to current levels.  As far as I know the 1st liens have not gotten as low as $50.  During the Sprint call they were briefly in the mid $60s but settled at about $69-$70 on Friday.  2nd lien are $44.5-$47. Not sure on the converts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timfarrar</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/10/11/the-spectrum-bubble-one-year-on/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>timfarrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2567#comment-690</guid>
		<description>My point is that Clearwire&#039;s bonds are trading so far below par that it seems to confirm that investors do not expect anyone to be prepared to pay a premium to acquire this spectrum.

Certainly SpectrumCo&#039;s AWS block is more desirable, simply because AWS is already in use and embedded in many devices (at least those made for T-Mobile, though not the iPhone). However, even there the cable companies don&#039;t appear to have received a compelling offer to buy their spectrum, and haven&#039;t reached any agreement to inject it into Sprint.

With respect to DISH, if the FCC was looking for a quick win, then it might have been prepared to grant the waiver, but with the LightSquared debacle (which will prompt Congressional questions over their spectrum &quot;windfall&quot; from the waiver) and the pending incentive auction bill (which may impose spectrum fees on non-auctioned spectrum, and thereby potentially force DISH to give up half the spectrum in exchange for the terrestrial waiver), I suspect the FCC will now be reluctant to act quickly.

All in all, this suggests that (as I predicted last year) speculating in spectrum is not likely to be a great investment, and its not just LightSquared that&#039;s turning out to be far more risky than most people expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that Clearwire&#8217;s bonds are trading so far below par that it seems to confirm that investors do not expect anyone to be prepared to pay a premium to acquire this spectrum.</p>
<p>Certainly SpectrumCo&#8217;s AWS block is more desirable, simply because AWS is already in use and embedded in many devices (at least those made for T-Mobile, though not the iPhone). However, even there the cable companies don&#8217;t appear to have received a compelling offer to buy their spectrum, and haven&#8217;t reached any agreement to inject it into Sprint.</p>
<p>With respect to DISH, if the FCC was looking for a quick win, then it might have been prepared to grant the waiver, but with the LightSquared debacle (which will prompt Congressional questions over their spectrum &#8220;windfall&#8221; from the waiver) and the pending incentive auction bill (which may impose spectrum fees on non-auctioned spectrum, and thereby potentially force DISH to give up half the spectrum in exchange for the terrestrial waiver), I suspect the FCC will now be reluctant to act quickly.</p>
<p>All in all, this suggests that (as I predicted last year) speculating in spectrum is not likely to be a great investment, and its not just LightSquared that&#8217;s turning out to be far more risky than most people expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmfsite</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/10/11/the-spectrum-bubble-one-year-on/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>tmfsite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2567#comment-689</guid>
		<description>you lost me on this one. So is it only the customers that have value?  If spectrum has no value (other than SpectrumCo&#039;s of course - theirs is really valuable.  Its the spectrum that everyone digs.) , then Charlie will get a free waiver because there is no better use for that spectrum.  

Contiguous spectrum even if it is a combination of leased and owned that sits in the TDD band in the Qualcomm 8960 chip will be quite useful in the near future.
You clearly have a thought or agenda in here somewhere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you lost me on this one. So is it only the customers that have value?  If spectrum has no value (other than SpectrumCo&#8217;s of course &#8211; theirs is really valuable.  Its the spectrum that everyone digs.) , then Charlie will get a free waiver because there is no better use for that spectrum.  </p>
<p>Contiguous spectrum even if it is a combination of leased and owned that sits in the TDD band in the Qualcomm 8960 chip will be quite useful in the near future.<br />
You clearly have a thought or agenda in here somewhere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
