<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brattle prattle&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/06/27/brattle-prattle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/06/27/brattle-prattle/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: krbarker</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2011/06/27/brattle-prattle/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>krbarker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=2130#comment-582</guid>
		<description>The latest CMRS Competitive Report from the FCC (http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=cmrs_reports) seems to confirm your numbers.  They indicate LS will have 260 POPs by 2015, and they also used the AWS-1 auction numbers.  By my math (with 40 MHz) of spectrum that&#039;s around $5.6B worth of spectrum.  However, as we have both discussed, this is highly subject to interference.  What I don&#039;t understand is how can LS keep dropping their power and amount of spectrum, and not change their valuation.  In fact, I&#039;m not sure I understand the whole base station power issue.  Dropping power of a base station simply means I need more to cover the same area at the same user QoS.  More base stations means more cumulative power in the spectrum creating the same issue.  We&#039;re still updating our interference analysis (www.questinygroup.com/qgi-blog), and maybe that will resolve the issue in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest CMRS Competitive Report from the FCC (<a href="http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=cmrs_reports" rel="nofollow">http://wireless.fcc.gov/index.htm?job=cmrs_reports</a>) seems to confirm your numbers.  They indicate LS will have 260 POPs by 2015, and they also used the AWS-1 auction numbers.  By my math (with 40 MHz) of spectrum that&#8217;s around $5.6B worth of spectrum.  However, as we have both discussed, this is highly subject to interference.  What I don&#8217;t understand is how can LS keep dropping their power and amount of spectrum, and not change their valuation.  In fact, I&#8217;m not sure I understand the whole base station power issue.  Dropping power of a base station simply means I need more to cover the same area at the same user QoS.  More base stations means more cumulative power in the spectrum creating the same issue.  We&#8217;re still updating our interference analysis (www.questinygroup.com/qgi-blog), and maybe that will resolve the issue in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
