<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does the MEXSAT order mean for L-band coordination?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tmfassociates.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-does-the-mexsat-order-mean-for-l-band-coordination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-does-the-mexsat-order-mean-for-l-band-coordination/</link>
	<description>Satellites, spectrum and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; LightSquared&#8217;s Mexican standoff&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://tmfassociates.com/blog/2010/12/20/what-does-the-mexsat-order-mean-for-l-band-coordination/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>TMF Associates MSS blog &#187; LightSquared&#8217;s Mexican standoff&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 02:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmfassociates.com/blog/?p=1044#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>[...] that Boeing is constructing, which is scheduled for launch at the end of 2013 or early in 2014. As I noted in December 2010, when the MEXSAT order was placed, after the MEXSAT launch, LightSquared will no longer have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Boeing is constructing, which is scheduled for launch at the end of 2013 or early in 2014. As I noted in December 2010, when the MEXSAT order was placed, after the MEXSAT launch, LightSquared will no longer have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
